Caveat verdict
qa-agent-testing
88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.
The skill appears to be a legitimate testing tool for AI agents with no evidence of malicious code or intent.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
100
security
90
transparency
90
maintenance
No red flags detected in static analysis.
Checked: 115 threat patterns · AST capability extraction · cross-zone compound shapes · permission integrity.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
Was this verdict right?
Thanks — recorded.