Caveat verdict

qa-architecture-auditor

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

The skill appears to be a legitimate code analysis tool with no evidence of malicious code or intent.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

73
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match high

Pipe to python โ€” executes piped content as Python code

references/tooling-matrix.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท | Python

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library โ€” network access

scripts/analyze_repo.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท axios

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

Requires 2 system binaries. (1 elevated: git).

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API