Caveat verdict
content-engine
qianxun-content-engine
This Chinese content engine skill deconstructs social media posts and generates content using Ofox/LLM APIs; file_write is for local output files and the architecture is transparent with no suspicious data exfiltration.
⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Permission integrity
file_read+write
Findings (6)
Possible hardcoded credential
scripts/content_engine/client.py · prose · downgraded · TOKEN='你的_token
subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python
scripts/content_engine/lookup.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(
References sudo — requests elevated privileges
scripts/content_engine/preflight.py · prose · downgraded · sudo
Python urllib.request — network access
scripts/content_engine/client.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request
Python os.environ.get — reads environment variable
scripts/content_engine/client.py · prose · downgraded · os.environ.get(
Popular HTTP library — network access
scripts/content_engine/video.py · prose · downgraded · got
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.
file_write Is this flag fair?
Thanks — recorded.