ClawAudit verdict

research-library

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

research-library stores and searches multimedia research data, which could potentially lead to security breaches if not properly managed.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

38
security
90
transparency
90
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (6)

Pattern match high

Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code

docs/EXTRACTION-GUIDE.md · prose · downgraded · | Python

Pattern match high

References sudo — requests elevated privileges

docs/EXTRACTION-GUIDE.md · code · sudo

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

tests/test_extractor.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Python urllib.request — network access

reslib/cli.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library — network access

reslib/models.py · prose · downgraded · got

Pattern match low

Python shutil file operation — copies/moves/deletes files

tests/test_cli.py · prose · downgraded · shutil.rmtree(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B/D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API