ClawAudit verdict

resilient-pdf

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill provides a fallback workflow for PDFs, but the use of package installation and execution sink detection raises concerns about potential misuse.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

83
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/extract_pdf.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Python urllib.request — network access

scripts/extract_pdf.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API