ClawAudit verdict

roundtable-pai

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill involves running a controller script with user input, which may lead to security issues if not properly sanitized, and has strict security boundaries that need to be respected.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

55
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (5)

Pattern match high

Uses eval() — can execute arbitrary code

tests/test_controller.py · prose · downgraded · eval(

Pattern match medium

Uses exec() — may execute shell commands

tests/test_controller.py · prose · downgraded · exec(

Pattern match medium

os.system/popen — direct OS command execution

tests/test_controller.py · prose · downgraded · os.system(

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library — network access

references/personas/taylorswift.md · prose · downgraded · Got

Pattern match low

Python urllib.request — network access

tests/test_controller.py · prose · downgraded · urllib.request

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API