ClawAudit verdict

scrapling-mcp

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

Identical guidance-layer content to scrapling-install, providing strategy and MCP integration patterns for the Scrapling library with no evidence of exfiltration or malicious behavior.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

30
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Makes network requests but does not declare curl/wget in required binaries

network_out

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read+write

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (4)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

references/api_reference.md · prose · downgraded · <script

Pattern match medium

Popular HTTP library — network access

references/spider-recipes.md · code · Got

Pattern match medium

Python shutil file operation — copies/moves/deletes files

references/spider-recipes.md · code · shutil.rmtree(

Pattern match low

Makes HTTP request to external URL

SKILL.md · code · fetch('https://

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_installnetwork_innetwork_outfile_write

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API