Caveat verdict

security-defense-line

shenmeng-security-defense-line

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Blockchain security defense skill for smart contract auditing; credential_access and network_in are for user-configured notification endpoints matching stated defensive purpose.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

33
security
30
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Code accesses API keys/tokens but declares no environment variables

credential_access

Findings (3)

Pattern match critical

Possible hardcoded credential

SKILL.md · code · token: "${TELEGRAM_BOT_TOKEN}

Pattern match high

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

references/contract-auditing.md · code · subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Python os.environ.get — reads environment variable

payment.py · prose · downgraded · os.environ.get(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

network_incredential_access

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API