Caveat verdict

study-buddy-niu

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan โ€” automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

A study assistant for Japanese N2 and software architecture exams that records wrong answers to a Feishu Bitable; no capabilities declared and all behavior is purely educational with no concerning patterns.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

70
security
80
transparency
80
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match critical

Possible hardcoded credential

SKILL.md ยท code ยท TOKEN: "SoZ5bkTBOa3LQisZHO1cAQuknDh

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API