Caveat verdict

study-notes

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

An HTML study notes generator for STEM subjects that reads uploaded PDFs and writes HTML output files; file access is limited to the user uploaded materials and output with no external network calls.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

45
security
60
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (3)

Pattern match critical

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

SKILL.md · code · <script

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

references/design-system.md · prose · downgraded · silently

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library — network access

scripts/test_build_and_check.py · prose · downgraded · got

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

file_readpackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API