ClawAudit verdict

superpowers-open

superpowers-openclaw

88
๐ŸŸข Trusted
Low risk โ€” reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

The skill collection appears to be a methodology for OpenClaw, emphasizing design-before-code and systematic debugging. No evidence of security risks.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

70
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (2)

Pattern match high

Instructs covert action โ€” may act without user awareness

test-driven-development/testing-anti-patterns.md ยท code ยท silently

Pattern match medium

References agent configuration files

using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md ยท code ยท CLAUDE.md

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API