Caveat verdict

system-controller

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Windows desktop automation skill with six modules for window management, process control, hardware, serial, IoT, and GUI automation; powerful but matches its stated purpose of desktop/hardware control.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

45
security
50
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (4)

Pattern match high

HTTP request to bare IP address — common in malicious payloads

references/command_reference.md · code · http://192.168.1.100

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/common.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

scripts/common.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run( command, capture_output=True,

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action — may act without user awareness

scripts/hardware_controller.py · prose · downgraded · Silently

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

package_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API