ClawAudit verdict

teamgram-server-architecture

45
🟠 Risky
Significant concerns — only install if you understand the risks

The skill provides a guide for building Telegram-compatible backends. While it seems to be a legitimate architecture guide, it may pose risks if not properly deployed or configured.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

50
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

HTTP request to bare IP address — common in malicious payloads

references/deployment.md · code · http://0.0.0.0

Pattern match high

Dynamic import() — loads module at runtime

references/service-development.md · code · import ( "

Pattern match medium

Opens WebSocket connection

SKILL.md · code · WebSocket

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

network_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API