ClawAudit verdict

tech-doc-writer

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

Technical documentation methodology guide; no network or credential access and matches stated documentation writing purpose.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

70
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (1)

Pattern match critical

Uses eval() — can execute arbitrary code

references/normalization-example.md · code · eval(

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API