ClawAudit verdict

thesis-workflow

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

The skill appears to be a complex workflow for academic paper writing and does not contain any obvious malicious or deceptive behavior.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

50
security
100
transparency
90
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

Pipe to python — executes piped content as Python code

scripts/outline_parser.py · prose · downgraded · | python3

Pattern match high

Uses eval() — can execute arbitrary code

scripts/reviewer.py · prose · downgraded · eval(

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/orchestrator.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API