ClawAudit verdict
token-panel-ultimate
Local token usage dashboard reading from local transcripts and official APIs into SQLite; skill notes explicitly state no external data sharing or cloud dependencies.
β Flagged for review β coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis β not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Permission integrity
package_install
Findings (7)
Possible hardcoded credential
BUDGET_README.md Β· code Β· API_KEY="sk-admin-...
References sudo β requests elevated privileges
BUDGET_README.md Β· code Β· sudo
HTTP request to bare IP address β common in malicious payloads
scripts/budget-panel-widget.user.js Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· http://127.0.0.1
Accesses OpenClaw config/secrets directly
scripts/manus-usage-fetch.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
Python os.getenv β reads environment variable
parsers/anthropic.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· os.getenv(
Python urllib.request β network access
scripts/chatgpt-usage-fetch.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· urllib.request
Python os.environ.get β reads environment variable
scripts/chatgpt-usage-fetch.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· os.environ.get(
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions β minimal attack surface.
package_install Is this flag fair?
Thanks β recorded.