ClawAudit verdict
vector-control
The skill appears to be a legitimate tool for controlling a Vector robot, with no evidence of malicious behavior.
β Flagged for review β coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.
Automated static analysis β not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.
Findings (2)
subprocess execution β runs system commands from Python
scripts/vector_control.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· subprocess.run(
Python urllib.request β network access
scripts/vector_control.py Β· prose Β· downgraded Β· urllib.request
Why the tier is capped
Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution β cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.
Permissions & capabilities
No declared permissions β minimal attack surface.
Is this flag fair?
Thanks β recorded.