ClawAudit verdict

vemem

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant concerns โ€” only install if you understand the risks

The skill handles biometric data and has capabilities to read/write to local storage, which could be a concern if not properly secured.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

83
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime โ€” transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

Instructs covert action โ€” may act without user awareness

references/mcp-tools.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท silently

Pattern match low

Popular HTTP library โ€” network access

references/troubleshooting.md ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท got

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

package_installnetwork_indata_encoding

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API