ClawAudit verdict

visual-qa

88
🟢 Trusted
Low risk — reviewed by ClawAudit, behavior matches stated purpose

A visual regression testing pipeline using screenshot capture and pixel diffing against local/dev servers; network_in is for capturing screenshots of local web apps, which matches the stated purpose.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

75
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Permission integrity

Installs packages at runtime — transitive dependencies are not auditable

package_install

Findings (2)

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

scripts/capture.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.Popen( command, shell=True

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

scripts/gate.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

network_inpackage_install

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API