Caveat verdict

vps-guardian

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant risk patterns flagged โ€” automated deep scan, not behavioral proof.

The install step downloads a Python script from a raw GitHub URL and installs it with sudo to /usr/local/bin, then runs as a daemon with authority to autonomously kill processes, modify iptables rules, and delete files requiring implicit trust in the remote script source.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

38
security
80
transparency
80
maintenance

Permission integrity

Makes network requests but does not declare curl/wget in required binaries

network_out

Performs file operations but does not declare file-accessing binaries

file_read+write

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

References sudo โ€” requests elevated privileges

SKILL.md ยท code ยท sudo

Pattern match medium

References webhook/callback URL

SKILL.md ยท code ยท webhook_url

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

src/guardian.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

network_outfile_writenetwork_in

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API