Caveat verdict

wechat-auto-reply-ai

88
🟢 Trusted
No high-risk patterns surfaced by the deep scan — automated capability review, not behavioral proof.

Auto-reply bot using purely visual UI automation (screenshots + keyboard simulation) with the Gemini API key explicitly entered by the user in a local web dashboard for its declared AI-parsing purpose; no credential exfiltration.

⚠ Flagged for review — coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis — not a human review. Caveat flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

40
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (5)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown — potential code injection

dashboard.py · prose · downgraded · <script>

Pattern match medium

HTTP request to bare IP address — common in malicious payloads

SKILL.md · prose · downgraded · http://0.0.0.0

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution — runs system commands from Python

dashboard.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run(

Pattern match medium

subprocess with shell=True — command injection vector

dashboard.py · prose · downgraded · subprocess.run("pgrep -f wechat-auto-reply/monitor_main.py", shell=True

Pattern match medium

os.system/popen — direct OS command execution

dashboard.py · prose · downgraded · os.system(

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class D). Final tier capped at Caution — cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions — minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API