ClawAudit verdict

zhihu-fetcher

45
๐ŸŸ  Risky
Significant concerns โ€” only install if you understand the risks

The skill executes scripts and accesses file systems, which could be a risk if not properly validated.

โš  Flagged for review โ€” coarse, uncorroborated signal, not a confirmed exploit. Review the config yourself before installing.

Automated static analysis โ€” not a human review. ClawAudit flags capabilities, not confirmed intent, and can produce false positives. Disagree with this verdict? Use Dispute below.

68
security
70
transparency
70
maintenance

Findings (3)

Pattern match high

<script> tag in markdown โ€” potential code injection

scripts/generate_html.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท <script>

Pattern match medium

subprocess execution โ€” runs system commands from Python

scripts/save_to_db.py ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท subprocess.run(

Pattern match low

Node http/https module โ€” low-level network access

snippets/cookie-manager.js ยท prose ยท downgraded ยท require('https')

Why the tier is capped

Execution sink present in raw bytes (Hard Floor: class B/D). Final tier capped at Caution โ€” cannot be lifted by any downgrade, example-payload opt-in, or allowlist.

Permissions & capabilities

No declared permissions โ€” minimal attack surface.

Is this flag fair?

Check another skill Browse the registry Auditing your own skills or configs? Use the API